Keeping us busy

So we had another rocket attack this past week. I'm a little bit surprised that the news got out so fast. They had the story nailed within about 12 hours. I don't think it was because MNC-I had a press release, either, although I'm sure they had to say something after the news got out. Fortunately, no one in my unit was injured, Unfortunately, 2 soldiers were killed and almost 40 were wounded. A couple of TCN's were injured, too. You know there are some places in this world that have dire poverty when the people will come to this place for a job.

So I think I talked about my fraternity brother in my last post...it is so ironic to run into him here. We hadn't seen each other in over 10 years, and it takes a war to bring us back together.

I was told that the statistics being reported about the numbers of insurgents being killed and captured are, shall we say, a little bit misleading. Units out there are fighting people who are connected through a spiderweb of alliances, tribal affiliations, gang affiliations, and sect affiliations. When the "insurgents" are killed and captured, however, they are reporting that they were members of Al Qaida. on a couple of levels, this is dishonest. First, a lot of the anti-coalition activity in the Baghdad area is done by Shia groups who hate Al Qaida in Iraq (AQIZ). Second, there is a great deal of internecine fighting going on between the Shia groups; they are jockeying for control. Third, the Sunni-Shia fighting that does occur is between Sunni and Shia. So all of these activities get counted as "anti-coalition" attacks or events, which clearly they are not. I don't want to sound like I'm nit-picking here, but what is being reported ends up being wrong, which then ends up influencing policy, which then produces a solution to the wrong problem--which then gets implemented, with the expectation that positive results will flow from it. It just won't work like that. We have soldiers doing a tremendous amount of work here, and that ends up getting wrapped around a policy that will not succeed. What amazes me is how the morale stays as high as it does. I think what happens is that the soldiers (who think about it) tend to internalize their doubts and keep them to themselves. Saying them out loud is tantamount to saying the Emperor has no clothes. And the soldiers plug along, doing the work of the superhero because that's why they came here.

One of my objectives here during this time was to do some informal professional development. I set out to read 5 books from the Army Chief of Staff's reading list. It is a list compiled for Officers and NCO's to use for learning about leadership in history, and to make the leaders of today think about what the leaders of the past have faced and how they solved the challenges of warfare and leadership, etc. So I have read two books already, and I'm on my third--The Memoirs of General Ulysses S. Grant. It's actually a pretty readable book. Anyway, his take on the Mexican War, while I'm sitting in my CHU in the middle of Baghdad, is really kind of interesting. The Mexican War was 160 years ago, but it just demonstrated to me that officers of that time faced the same moral dilemma some of us struggle with in this war. And that's about all I've got to say about that.

I ordered a laptop, so when i get that online I'll be back to more frequent posts and I'll be putting up pictures again. Having to go to the MWR facility to post is a little inconvenient and I can't plug a thumb drive into the terminals here. I have a bunch of cool photos that I haven't been able to show, so in the next few weeks I will be putting a lot up. I go on leave next month, so I probably won't post too much then, but we'll see. Until next time...

OUT